Loading
Consolidating workloads onto a hypervisor cluster, with shared storage and the resilience to lose a host without losing a service.
Virtualisation stops one application from needing one physical box. Beyond utilisation, the real gain is operational: snapshots before changes, whole-machine backups, and moving a workload off failing hardware without an outage.
The design decisions that matter are host sizing and shared storage. Undersized hosts mean you can't lose one; storage that can't sustain the IOPS makes every workload feel slow regardless of CPU.
We size for N+1 as standard, so a host can fail or be patched without capacity becoming the problem.
Publishing exclusions is deliberate. Nobody in this market does it, and it's the fastest way to avoid a variation conversation later.
If yours isn't here, ask — we'd rather answer it before you buy than after.
Hyper-V if you're Windows-heavy and already licensed. VMware where the ecosystem and feature depth justify the cost. Proxmox where budget matters and your team is comfortable with Linux. All three are solid — the honest differentiator is licensing cost and in-house familiarity.
Almost. Exceptions are workloads with hardware dongles, specific real-time requirements, or vendor support terms that forbid it. We identify those during assessment rather than at cutover.
Free site survey first. You keep the findings whether or not you buy.
